A gap is not a weakness list.
The one skill that moves the ceiling most, and the plan to close it.
One gap moves the ceiling most.
Illustrative engine read on the real development structure (leverage ranking, plan sequencing, developability speed). Demonstration figures.
Two players gained five KR. One developed.
Same five-point gain. One added a skill that holds up and lifted his ceiling; the other just played more minutes on the same game. Development is not opportunity, and their futures are nothing alike.
Illustrative engine read. Real output structure, demonstration figures.
A plan is only as real as the hands that run it.
The gap is the same. The odds of closing it are not, because they depend on who develops it. The read matches the exact need to the staff whose record develops that trait, for that archetype, and re-prices the trajectory.
Same player, same gap, two programs. The projected ceiling moves with the developer, because a plan handed to a staff that cannot run it is not a plan. This is the coaching read pointed inward: development competence re-prices a player's odds, it never grades the coach. The coaching evaluation lives in Staff.
Illustrative engine read built on the real coaching-impact structure. Demonstration figures.
College is an ascending three-year runway. The pro projection is a separate, lower-confidence peak-timing arc, surfaced on demand, never shown next to the college number as the same read.
Illustrative. College and pro are separate engines on one scale; the pro arc is a lower-confidence forecast.
Every gap is priced as the highest-leverage skill you can actually close, in the hands that can close it.
The same read, across a career.
The gap, the plan, the arc, and the developer turn a rating into a trajectory.